add to favorites : reference url : add a comment back to results : previous : next
 
Credibility and other criteria for “good evidence”: integrating diverse perspectives, toward better judgments about evaluation and applied research
item thumbnail
To start video, click on one of the links below:
  • 40 Kbps (Dial Up. Requires QuickTime 6)
  • 300 Kbps (DSL/Cable. Requires QuickTime 7)
  • 800 Kbps (DSL/Cable. Requires QuickTime 7)
  • LAN (Recommended for Claremont campus. Requires QuickTime 7)
TitleCredibility and other criteria for "good evidence": integrating diverse perspectives, toward better judgments about evaluation and applied research
CreatorMark, Melvin M.
SymposiumWhat Constitutes Credible Evidence in Evaluation and Applied Research
SeriesClaremont Graduate University's Stauffer Symposium Series
Date2006-08-19
Subject-LCSHEvaluation
Social sciences
Subject-LocalCredible Evidence
DescriptionMelvin Mark, professor of psychology at The Pennsylvania State University, presents this conclusion to the symposium, "What Constitutes Credible Evidence in Evaluation and Applied Research." Mark synthesizes presentations given during this symposium, focusing particularly on how the presentations described what does actually constitute credibility in research, and how these presentations themselves demonstrated one of the main sources of disagreement about credibility within the field. According to Mark, one of the main causes of academic debate surrounding this issue is the lack of contextual descriptions in discussions of what credibility means. In other words what constitutes credibility changes depending on what was studied and for what purpose, who is describing it and why, and who is interpreting the credibility and why. Mark compares this common sense interpretation of when evidence is credible to the fact that evaluators and applied social scientists often seek a gold standard. In the case of contextually driven issues such as credibility, a gold standard is unlikely to exist.
PublisherClaremont Graduate University. School of Behavioral and Organizational Sciences
Languageeng
SourceOriginal video: 60 minute digital 8mm cassette; Tape 10; recorded symposium presentation entitled, "Credibility and Other Criteria for 'Good Evidence': Integrating Diverse Perspectives, Toward Better Judgments About Evaluation and Applied Research" from the symposium entitled, "What Constitutes Credible Evidence in Evaluation and Applied Research" August 19, 2006
RelationClaremont Graduate University Lectures on Applied Psychology and Evaluation Science - http://ccdl.libraries.claremont.edu/col/lap
RightsPhysical rights are retained by the institution. Copyright is retained in accordance with U. S. Copyright laws.
TypeMoving Image
Running time00:30:04
Video Format - 40 Kbpsvideo/mp4
Video Format - 300 Kbpsvideo/H264; video/quicktime
Video Format - 800 Kbpsvideo/H264; video/quicktime
Video Format - LANvideo/H264; video/quicktime
Object File Namelap00012
No user comments available for this item
The CCDL does not endorse nor validate as authoritative any comments made by users.
add to favorites : reference url : add a comment back to results : previous : next